Crime and Punishment Essay

The gist of Notes from underpass to the artistic world is difficult to overestimate. As menti superstard by L. P. Grosman Notes from resistivity is one of the most exposing compositions of Dostoyevsky. Never has it happened again that he opens up in such broadness all of his most intimate thoughts, not meant for express secrets of his heart (Grosman, 299). Becoming the prelude to other great sprains of Dostoyevsky, Notes from Underground influenced world literature, not only Russian literary growth.Merezhkovskii thought that the main difference between Dostoyevskys and Nietzsches survive freedoms is that Dostoyevsky, growing surreptitious ideas in his characters, but not completing them still tried to get the picture onto Russian orthodoxy, while the other praised the man Just as Nietzsche Dostoyevsky considers the last gift of freedom to be the man-god, the antichrist, with the difference in the two macrocosm that Nietzsche blesses this gift, and Dostoyevsky curses it (Merezhkovskii, 217 218).By the thoughts of Berdyaev, if before Notes from Underground Dostoyevsky was no more than a humanist, full of compassion for the poor people, the humiliated and insulted, the characters of the House of the Dead, and then from Notes from Underground begins the brilliant ideological dialectic of Dostoyevsky. He is no drawn- forbidden simply a psychologist, he is a metaphysician he explores, to the depths, the tragedies of human spirit. He is no longer a humanist by the old content of the word He has eke outly torn away from Belinskys humanism. (Berdyaev, 36).At the same time Berdyaev did not share this opinion with Shestov about Dostoyevsky macrocosm an exclusive belowground psychologist Dostoyevsky possesses underground psychology only in the second gear of the spiritual journey of man. He does not leave us in the hopeless circle of underground psychology, he removes us from it (Berdyaev, 141). Losing humanistic creed in man, Dostoyevsky has no ch oice but to be loyal to the Christian principles, deepening, strengthening and enriching them therefore, he cannot be a gloom, hopelessly-pessimistic writer.In his darkest and most tender moments Dostoyevsky has the light of Christ the freeing light (37). Notes from Underground was praised as one of the most reaction producing stories by Yermylov, where-in was conducted not only malicious animosity with the novel of a genius Russian revolutionary-democrat NG Chernyshevsky, but to a fault told about moral crimes. Thus in the face of the conscience of homo Dostoyevskys role in moral crime proved massive because you cannot talk about the crime with malice (Yermylov, 42 43).Exploring the works of the 1860s, in particular the novel Notes from Underground, Kirpotin concluded about the importance of its poetics for all following works of Dostoyevsky and specific to his novel form The poetics of Notes from Underground contains in spite of appearance it undeveloped poetics from the l ater works of Dostoyevsky. The merging of philosophy and narration in Notes from Underground, and its dissolution in the invention soon after lead to the creation of the first great novel by Dostoyevsky Crime and penalty, a new novel which was specific to Dostoyevskys type.(Kirpotin, 472, 475) The genius of Dostoyevsky in Notes from Underground is expressed in that he felt, and strongly expressed the psychology of philosophical experience. Demonstrating how ones character forms or deforms under laborious influence, he was able to show the crystallization of the human spirit this impression has gained world renowned meaning. Separating Dostoyevsky from his character and considering Notes from Underground as a complete work of art and nothing less, Kirpotin admitted the truth expressed in the story about the authors vision, retaining its aesthetic nature.However, through aesthetics Dostoyevsky peered into anthology, into the philosophy of the world, into space and society, but stated Kirpotin as he soundless them, of course (Kirpotin, 175). Understanding the writer, according to Kirpotin was inadequate for the ideas of the advanced people in society Dostoyevsky kept to his ingenious artistic discoveries despite his beliefs.Prospective studies carried out under the archetypal approach in the study of the underground date help find the answers to a number of important questions about this work on the true place of the man from the underground in Dostoyevskys work, on the expressive or un-expressive characteristics in all its characters and on the center of poetic incarnation of the underground phenomenon, on the influence of the image of an underground hero on the classic works of world literature, which spawned a satisfying gallery of underground characters.